Socio Demographic Factors and Work Performance of Forest Workers in Cajuput Leaf Harvesting at RPH Nglipar, KPH Yogyakarta
الشريط الجانبي للمقالة
محتوى المقالة الرئيسي
الملخص
Cajuput leaf harvesting is a technical forest activity of non-timber forest products. The productivity of cajuput leaf harvesting is strongly influenced by aspects of human resource capacity and biophysical aspects. This study aims to identify the socio-demographic conditions of forest workers in cajuput leaves harvesting and to analyze the standards performance of harvesting in FMU Yogyakarta. A survey of 100 samples of workers were used to determine socio-demographic characteristics, while in-depth observations were made on 3 workers with different characteristics to determine work performance. The socio-demographic conditions of workers in the cajuput leaf harvesting are seen from eight characteristics, namely age, gender, education, number of dependents, livelihoods, and land ownership. Workers have an average age of 58 years old and are male. The level of education possessed by workers is dominated by graduating from elementary school (SD) by 64 %. The average number of dependents per worker household is 4 people, with the main livelihood being farmers. The average land ownership of workers in cajuput leaf harvesting is 0.17 ha. The work performance of harvesting for normal people in the FMU Yogyakarta is 72.23 kg / hour.
تفاصيل المقالة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2020 Jurnal Wasian
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License
All articles published in Wasian Journal are the property of the authors. By submitting an article to Wasian Journal, authors agree to the following terms:
-
Copyright Ownership: The author(s) retain copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions. Authors grant the journal the right to publish the work first and to distribute it as open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
-
Licensing: Articles published in Wasian Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the source of the material
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -
Author's Rights: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of published work.
-
Third-Party Content: If your article contains material (e.g., images, tables, or figures) for which you do not hold copyright, you must obtain permission from the copyright holder to use the material in your article. This permission must include the right for you to grant the journal the rights described above.
-
Reprints and Distribution: Authors have the right to distribute the final published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided that the original publication in Wasian Journal is acknowledged.
For the reader you are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rightsmay limit how you use the material.
Agarwal, B. (2015). The power of numbers in gender dynamics: illustrations from community forestry groups. Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.936007.
Agustina, Z. A., & Suharmiati, S. (2017). Pemanfaatan Minyak Kayu Putih (Melaleuca leucadendra Linn) sebagai Alternatif Pencegahan Kasus Infeksi Saluran Pernafasan Akut di Pulau Buru. Jurnal Kefarmasian Indonesia, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.22435/jki.v7i2.5654.120-126.
Andersen, H.-E., Reutebuch, S. E., McGaughey, R. J., d’Oliveira, M. V. N., & Keller, M. (2014). Monitoring selective logging in western Amazonia with repeat lidar flights. Remote Sensing of Environment, 151, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.049.
Arora-Jonsson, S. (2004). Relational dynamics and strategies: Men and women in a forest community in Sweden. Agriculture and Human Values, 21(4), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-003-1222-6
Bjerkan, A. M. (2011). Health, environment, safety culture and climate – analysing the relationships to occupational accidents. Journal of Risk Research, Volume 13(445–477).
Blumberg, M; Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance. Academy of Managemen Review, 7(4), 560–569.
BPS Provinsi DIY. (2017). Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Dalam Angka 2017.
Butler, B. J., Markowski-Lindsay, M., Snyder, S., Catanzaro, P., Kittredge, D. B., Andrejczyk, K., Dickinson, B. J., Eryilmaz, D., Hewes, J. H., Randler, P., Tadle, D., & Kilgore, M. A. (2014). Effectiveness of Landowner Assistance Activities: An Examination of the USDA Forest Service’s Forest Stewardship Program. Journal of Forestry, 112(2). https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.13-066.
Cevikcan, E., & Kilic, H. S. (2016). Tempo rating approach using fuzzy rule based system and westinghouse method for the assessment of normal time. International Journal of Industrial Engineering : Theory Applications and Practice, 23(1).
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (2019). Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.24912/jmts.v2i3.7886.
Fujiwara, T., Awang, S. A., Widayanti, W. T., Septiana, R. M., Hyakumura, K., & Sato, N. (2017). Socioeconomic Conditions Affecting Smallholder Timber Management in Gunungkidul District, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia. Small-Scale Forestry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-017-9374-1
Hedge, A. (2016). Ergonomic Workplace Design for Health, Wellness, and Productivity. In Ergonomic Workplace Design for Health, Wellness, and Productivity. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315374000.
Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI. (2019). KLHK Dorong Pengembangan Usaha Minyak Kayu Putih Di Lahan Perhutani. https://www.menlhk.go.id/site/single_post/2253.
Kozová, M., Dobšinská, Z., Pauditšová, E., Tomčíková, I., & Rakytová, I. (2018). Network and participatory governance in urban forestry: An assessment of examples from selected Slovakian cities. Forest Policy and Economics, 89, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.09.016.
Leão, T.C.C., Lobo, D., & Scotson, L. (2017). Economic and Biological Conditions Influence the Sustainability of Harvest of Wild Animals and Plants in Developing Countries. Ecological Economics, 140, 14–21.
Lind-Riehl, J., Jeltema, S., Morrison, M., Shirkey, G., Mayer, A. L., Rouleau, M., & Winkler, R. (2015). Family legacies and community networks shape private forest management in the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan (USA). Land Use Policy, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.005.
Markowski-Lindsay, M., Catanzaro, P., Milman, A., & Kittredge, D. (2016). Understanding Family Forest Land Future Ownership and Use: Exploring Conservation Bequest Motivations. Small-Scale Forestry, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-015-9320-z.
Moses, G. L. (2016). Fundamental aspects of temperature classification. EI Electrical Insulation Conference Materials and Application, EIC 1962. https://doi.org/10.1109/EIC.1962.7456051.
Mutenje, M. J., Ortmann, G. F., & Ferrer, S. R. D. (2011). Management of non-timber forestry products extraction: Local institutions, ecological knowledge and market structure in South-Eastern Zimbabwe. Ecological Economics, 70, 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.036.
Nakajima, T., Shiraishi, N., Kanomata, H., & Matsumoto, M. (2017). A method to maximise forest profitability through optimal rotation period selection under various economic, site and silvicultural conditions. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 47(1).
Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H. (2017). Agricultural diversification and dietary diversity: A feminist political ecology of the everyday experiences of landless and smallholder households in northern Ghana. Geoforum, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.003.
Özden, S, Nayir, I., Göl, C., Ediş, S., & Yilmaz, H. (2011). Health problems and conditions of the forestry workers in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(27), 5884–5890. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.505.
Permadi, D. B., Burton, M., Pandit, R., Race, D., Ma, C., Mendham, D., & Hardiyanto, E. B. (2018). Socio-economic factors affecting the rate of adoption of acacia plantations by smallholders in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 76, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.054.
Qomariah, L. N. (2017). Metode Penelitian Survey. In Progress in Physical Geography (Vol. 14, Issue 7). Pustaka LPJES.
Smith, H.E., & Hudson, M.. (2017). Livelihood diversification : The role of charcoal production in Southern Malawi. Energy for Sustainable Developmen, 36, 22–36.
Stanislovaitis, A., Brukas, V., & Mozgeris, G. (2015). Forest owner is more than her goal: a qualitative typology of Lithuanian owners. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.998706.
Sudradjat, S. E. (2020). Minyak Kayu Putih, Obat Alami dengan Banyak Khasiat: Tinjauan Sistematik. Jurnal Kedokteran Meditek, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v26i2.1843.
Thoms, C. A. (2008). Community control of resources and the challenge of improving local livelihoods: A critical examination of community forestry in Nepal. Geoforum, 39(3), 1452–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.01.006.
Weiss, G., Gudurić, I., & Wolfslehner, B. (2012). Review of forest owners’ organizations in selected Eastern European countries. www.fao.org/forestry.
Wilmsen C, B. D. (2015). Working in the shadows: Safety and health in forestry services in southern Oregon. Journal of Forestry, 113(3), 315–324.
