The Study of Faustmann Formula Application in Sustainable Natural Forest Management in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the forest economics literature, Faustmann formula is highly adopted for profit maximization problem in forest management, mostly in plantation forest. Stylized models of Faustmann formula to be applied in selective logging regime have also been studied extensively in multi-age and multi-species forest. In general, natural forest managers in Indonesia have not adopted the Faustmann formula in their management decisions. Sustainability aspect in natural forest management is applied based on silvicultural consideration, i.e. measuring residual stand that is able to be harvested in the next cutting cycle. This study aims to analyze the application of Faustmann formula in the current selective logging regime in Indonesia (i.e. TPTI), so that the natural forest managers may gain maximum profit and sustainable. This study is a qualitative research based on literature review. The results of this study show that under deterministic growth model (i.e. matrix transition model) and robust damage model (i.e. transition matrix with different damage proportions on each species and diameter class), the Faustmann formula can be applied for selective Logging regime in Indonesia.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Wasian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License
All articles published in Wasian Journal are the property of the authors. By submitting an article to Wasian Journal, authors agree to the following terms:
-
Copyright Ownership: The author(s) retain copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions. Authors grant the journal the right to publish the work first and to distribute it as open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
-
Licensing: Articles published in Wasian Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the source of the material
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -
Author's Rights: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of published work.
-
Third-Party Content: If your article contains material (e.g., images, tables, or figures) for which you do not hold copyright, you must obtain permission from the copyright holder to use the material in your article. This permission must include the right for you to grant the journal the rights described above.
-
Reprints and Distribution: Authors have the right to distribute the final published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided that the original publication in Wasian Journal is acknowledged.
For the reader you are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rightsmay limit how you use the material.
Amacher, G. S., Ollikainen, M., & Koskela, E. (2009). Economics of forest resources. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Siry, J. P., & Grebner, D. L. (2017). Forest management and planning. Second Edition. Burlington USA: Academic Press.
Boscolo, M., & Buongiorno, J. (1997). Managing a tropical rainforest for timber, carbon storage and tree diversity. Commonwealth Forestry Review, 76(4), 246-254.
Buongiorno, J., Holvorsen, E. A., Bollandsas, O. M., Gobakken, T., & Hofstad, O. (2012). Optimizing management regimes for carbon storage and other benefits in uneven-aged stands dominated by Norway spruce, with a derivation of the economic supply of carbon storage. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27(5), 1-14.
Buongiorno, J., & Michie, B. R. (1980). A Matrix model of uneven-aged forest management. Forest Science, 26(4), 609-625.
Cairns, R. D. (2017). Faustmann's formulas for forests. Natural Resource Modeling, 30(1), 52-73.
Chang, S. J. (2018a). Forest property taxation under the generalized Faustmann formula. Forest Policy and Economics, 88, 38-45.
Chang, S. J. (2018b). Forest valuation under the generalized Faustmann formula with taxation. Forest Policy and Economics, 88, 46-51.
da Silva, D. A., Piazza, G., Fantini, A. C., & Vibrans, A. C. (2018). Forest management in a secondary Atlantic Rainforest: assessing the harvest damage. Advances in Forestry Science, 4(4), 187-193.
Diaz-Balteiro, L., & Rodríguez, L. C. E. (2017). Influence of carbon sequestration in an optimal set of coppice rotations for eucalyptus plantations. In F. Bravo, V. LeMay, & R. Jandl (Eds.), Managing Forest Ecosystems: The Challenge of Climate Change (pp. 187-204). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Enggelina, A. (1998). Volume equation. In J.-G. Bertault & K. Kadir (Eds.), Silvicultural research in a lowland mixed dipterocarp forest of East Kalimantan: the contribution of STREK project: CIRAD-forêt.
Galinato, G. I., & Uchida, S. (2011). The Effect of temporary certified emission reductions on forest rotations and carbon supply. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 59(1), 145-164. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7976.2010.01203.x
Hoel, M., Holtsmark, B., & Holtsmark, K. (2014). Faustmann and the climate. Journal of Forest Economics, 20(2), 192-210.
Hurttala, H., Cao, T., & Valsta, L. (2017). Optimization of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) management with the total net return from the value chain. Journal of Forest Economics, 28, 1-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2017.04.001
Indrajaya, Y. (2013). Penentuan daur optimal hutan tanaman sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria (L.) Nielsen) dengan metode Faustmann. Jurnal Penelitian Agroforestry, 1(1), 31-40.
Indrajaya, Y. (2015). Perbandingan model kerusakan tegakan tinggal di hutan alam dipterocarp untuk mendukung mekanisme REDD+. Jurnal Penelitian Ekosistem Dipterokarpa, 1(1).
Indrajaya, Y. (2016). Daur optimal hutan rakyat manglid di Kecamatan Kawalu, Tasikmalaya, Jawa Barat. dalam M. Siarudin, A. Sudomo, Y. Indrajaya, T. Puspitojati, & N. Mindawati (Eds.), Hutan rakyat manglid: Status riset dan pengembangan. Bogor, Indonesia: FORDA PRESS.
Indrajaya, Y., & Siarudin, M. (2013). Daur finansial hutan rakyat jabon di Kecamatan Pakenjeng, Kabupaten Garut, Jawa Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman, 10(4).
Indrajaya, Y., & Siarudin, M. (2015a). Daur tebang optimal hutan rakyat gmelina (Gmelina arborea Roxb.)di Tasikmalaya dan Banjar, Jawa Barat, Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Kehutanan, 12(2), 109-116.
Indrajaya, Y., & Siarudin, M. (2015b). Pengaturan hasil agroforestry jabon (Neolamarckia cadamba Miq.) dan kapulaga di Kecamatan Pakenjeng, Garut, Jawa Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Kehutanan, 12(2), 117-125.
Indrajaya, Y., & Sudomo, A. (2013). Analisis finansial agroforestry sengon dan kapulaga di Desa Payungagung, Kecamatan Panumbangan, Ciamis. Jurnal Penelitian Agroforestry, 1(2), 123-132.
Indrajaya, Y., van der Werf, E., van Ierland, E., Mohren, F., & Weikard, H.-P. (2016). The Potential of REDD+ for carbon sequestration in tropical forests: Supply Curves for carbon storage for East-Kalimantan. Forest Policy and Economics, 71, 1-10.
Ingram, C. D., & Buongiorno, J. (1996). Income and diversity tradeoffs from management mixed lowland dipterocarps in Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 9(2), 242-270.
Kementerian Kehutanan. (2009). Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor: P.11/Menhut-II/2009 tentang Sistem silvikultur dalam areal izin usaha pemanfaatan hasil hutan kayu pada hutan produksi, Nomor:P.11/Menhut-II/2009 C.F.R. (2009).
Krisnawati, H., Suhendang, E., & Parthama, I. P. (2008). Transition matrix growth models for logged over natural forest in Central Kalimantan. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan dan Konservasi Alam, 5(2), 107-128.
Lee, J., McKenney, D., Pedlar, J., & Arain, M. (2017). Biophysical and economic analysis of black spruce regeneration in Eastern Canada using global climate model productivity outputs. Forests, 8(4), 106.
Macpherson, A. J., Schulze, M. D., Carter, D. R., & Vidal, E. (2010). A Model for comparing reduced impact logging with conventional logging for an Eastern Amazonian Forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(11), 2002-2011. doi:DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.050
Martin, P. A., Newton, A. C., Pfeifer, M., Khoo, M., & Bullock, J. M. (2015). Impacts of tropical selective logging on carbon storage and tree species richness: A meta-analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 356, 224-233.
Mendoza, G. A., Onal, H., & Soetjipto, W. (2000). Optimising tree diversity and economc returns from managed mixed forest in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 12(2), 298-319.
Mendoza, G. A., & Setyarso, A. (1986). A transition matrix forest growth-model for evaluating alternative harvesting schemes in Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Management, 15(3), 219-228. doi:Doi 10.1016/0378-1127(86)90068-X
Nakajima, T., Shiraishi, N., Kanomata, H., & Matsumoto, M. (2017). A method to maximise forest profitability through optimal rotation period selection under various economic, site and silvicultural conditions. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 47(1), 4. doi:10.1186/s40490-016-0079-6
Navarrete, E. (2012). Modeling optimal pine stands harvest under stochastic wood stock and price in Chile. Forest policy and economics, 15, 54-59.
Olschewski, R., & Benitez, P. C. (2010). Optimizing joint production of timber and carbon sequestration of afforestation projects. Journal of Forest Economics, 16(1), 1-10. doi:DOI 10.1016/j.jfe.2009.03.002
Perman, R., Ma, Y., McGilvray, J., & Common, M. (2003). Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. Third Edition. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Roitman, I., & Vanclay, J. K. (2015). Assessing size–class dynamics of a neotropical gallery forest with stationary models. Ecological Modelling, 297, 118-125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.11.009
Samuelson, P. A. (2012). Economics of forestry in an evolving society. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 4(3), 173-195.
Sasaki, N., Chheng, K., & Ty, S. (2012). Managing production forests for timber production and carbon emission reductions under the REDD+ scheme. Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 35-44.
Sinha, A., Rämö, J., Malo, P., Kallio, M., & Tahvonen, O. (2017). Optimal management of naturally regenerating uneven-aged forests. European Journal of Operational Research, 256(3), 886-900.
Sist, P., Picard, N., & Gourlet-Fleury, S. (2003). Sustainable cutting cycle and yields in a lowland mixed dipterocarp forest of Borneo. Annals of Forest Science, 60(8), 803-814. doi:DOI 10.1051/forest:2003075
Susaeta, A., Chang, S. J., Carter, D. R., & Lal, P. (2014). Economics of carbon sequestration under fluctuating economic environment, forest management and technological changes: An application to forest stands in the southern United States. Journal of Forest Economics, 20(1), 47-64.
Xabadia, A., & Goetz, R. U. (2010). The optimal selective logging regime and the Faustmann formula. Journal of Forest Economics, 16(1), 63-82. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2009.06.002
Zhou, W., & Gao, L. (2016). The impact of carbon trade on the management of short-rotation forest plantations. Forest Policy and Economics, 62, 30-35. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.008
