Stakeholder Analysis of Implementation of Social Forestry Program at KPH Telawa, Central Java
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social Forestry at Java island or known as IPHPS (Permit for the Utilization of Social Forestry) is part of the agrarian reform of the forestry sector which expected to solve tenurial problems and improve forest governance. The successful implementation of this program could not be separated of the roles of stakeholder involved. This study aimed to 1) identified stakeholders and their roles in the implementation of IPHPS, and 2) analyzed the relationships between stakeholders in the implementation of IPHPS. This research was conducted in the KPH Telawa area of Boyolali Regency, Central Java. This research uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Data collection was done by observation, interviews, and literature studies. Data were analyzed based on the research objectives at stakeholder analysis conducted by identifying stakeholders and their roles as well as the relationships between them in the implementation of IPHPS. They involved in the implementation of IPHPS at the Telawa KPH included Perhutani (KPH) Telawa, KTH IPHPS holders (Wonomakmur 1, Wonomakmur 2, Wonolestari 1, and Wonolestari 2) LMDH Participants PHBM, BPKH IX, BPDASHL Pemali Jratun, Field Companion, BDK Kadipaten, Forestry Foundation, NGO Rejo Semut Ireng, PSKL, LHK Office of Central Java Province, BPSKL Jabalnusra, Forest Development Financing Center Public Service Agency (P3H-BLU). Each of the above stakeholders has their respective strengths and interests. This affects the pattern of relations between the stakeholders which in turn will determine the results of the program. A good relationship will support the successful implementation of the program while a bad relationship can hamper the implementation of the program.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Wasian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Jurnal Long Range Planning, 44, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001
Andani, V. P. (2019). Implementasi Ijin Pemanfaatan Hutan Perhutanan Sosial di Desa Wonoharjo, Kecamatan Kemusu, Kabupaten Boyolali . Thesis Tidak Diterbitkan, UGM, Yogyakarta. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/168369
Crosby, B. L. (1991). Technical Notes Stakeholder Analysis: A Vital Tool for Strategic Managers. A publication of USAID’s Implementing Policy Change Project. USAIDS, Washington, DC. https://openlmis.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/04/IPC_Stakeholder_Analysis_A_Vital_Tool_for_Strategic_Managers.pdf
Hastanti, B. W., Irawan, E., Haryanti, N., Raharjo, S. A. S., Hermawan, A., Fandriani, S., & Boediono, A. (2019). Strategi Implementasi Reforma Agraria Sektor Kehutanan. Laporan Hasil Penelitian. Tidak Diterbitkan, BPPTPDAS, Surakarta
Herawati, T., Widjayanto, N., Saharuddin, & Eriyatno. (2010). Analisis respon pemangku kepentingan di daerah terhadap kebijakan hutan tanaman rakyat. Jurnal Analis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 7(1), 13–25. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/29207-ID-analisis-respon-pemangku-kepentingan-di-daerah-terhadap-kebijakan-hutan-tanaman.pdf
Junengsih, J., Putri, E. I. K., & Ismail, A. (2017). Analisis stakeholder dalam pengelolaan DAS Citarum dan limbah industri. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 4(2), 112–124.
Marliyana, T. (2020). Pengorgasian kelompok tani dalam memperjuangkan perhutanan sosial (studi kasus di Desa Mentasan, Kecamatan Kawunganten, Kabupaten Cilacap. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 9(1), 376 295. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jas/article/view/41369/28148
Martin, E., & Winarno, B. (2010). Peran para pihak dalam pemanfaatan lahan gambut: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ilir, Sumatra Selatan. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 7(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2010.7.2.81-95
Murti, H. A. (2018). Perhutanan Sosial bagi akses keadilan masyarakat dan pengurangan kemiskinan. Jurnal Analis Kebijakan, 2(2), 62–75. http://jurnalpusaka.lan.go.id/index.php/jurnalpusaka/article/view/29/27
Muzani. (2014). Strategi peningkatan peran stakeholder dalam pengelolaan mangrove di Kabupaten Tangerang. Jurnal Spatial Wahana Komunikasi dan Informasi Geografi, 12(2), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.21009/spatial.122.04
Nurfatriani, F., & Alviya, I. (2019). Efektivitas kebijakan alokasi lahan 12,7 Juta ha untuk perhutanan Sosial: Studi kasus di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara dan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 16(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2019.16.1
Nurfatriani, F., Darusman, D., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Yustika, A. E. (2015). Analisis pemangku kepentingan dalam transformasik kebijakan fiskal hijau. Jurnal Analisi Kebijakan Kehutanan, 12(2), 105–124.
Oktavia, S., & Saharuddin. (2013). Hubungan peran stakeholders dengan partisipasi masyarakat dalam program agropolitan Desa Karacak Kecamatan Leuwiliang Kabupaten Bogor. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 1(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v1i3.9407
Raharjo, S. A. S., Hastanti, B. W., & Haryanti, N. (2020). Dinamika kelembagaan perhutanan sosial di wilayah Pehutani: Studi kasus di KPH Telawa, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 11(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.11.2.2020.183-197
Roslinda, E., Darusman, D., Suharjito, D., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2012). Analisis pemangku kepentingan dalam pengelolaan Taman Nasional Danau Sentarum Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu, Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, XVIII(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.18.2.78
Yeny, I., Agustarini, R., & Heryati, Y. (2018). Analisis para pihak dalam kerjasama pengembangan hasil hutan bukan kayu di Kabupaten Pasaman Barat. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 15(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2018.15.2.143-164
Zubayr, M., Darusman, D., Nugroho, B., & Nurrohmat, D. R. (2014). Peranan para pihak dalam kebijakan implementasi penggunaan kawasan hutan untuk pertambangan. Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 11(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2014.11.3.239-259
