Stakeholder Analysis of Implementation of Social Forestry Program at KPH Telawa, Central Java

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Download this PDF file (英语)
已出版: Jun 30, 2021
View citations in Google Scholar

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Baharinawati Wilhan Hastanti Baharinawati
Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai
S. Agung Sri Raharjo Agung
Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai

摘要

Social Forestry at Java island or known as IPHPS (Permit for the Utilization of Social Forestry) is part of the agrarian reform of the forestry sector which expected to solve tenurial problems and improve forest governance. The successful implementation of this program could not be separated of the roles of stakeholder involved. This study aimed to 1) identified stakeholders and their roles in the implementation of IPHPS, and 2) analyzed the relationships between stakeholders in the implementation of IPHPS. This research was conducted in the KPH Telawa area of Boyolali Regency, Central Java. This research uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Data collection was done by observation, interviews, and literature studies. Data were analyzed based on the research objectives at stakeholder analysis conducted by identifying stakeholders and their roles as well as the relationships between them in the implementation of IPHPS. They involved in the implementation of IPHPS at the Telawa KPH included Perhutani (KPH) Telawa, KTH IPHPS holders (Wonomakmur 1, Wonomakmur 2, Wonolestari 1, and Wonolestari 2) LMDH Participants PHBM, BPKH IX, BPDASHL Pemali Jratun, Field Companion, BDK Kadipaten, Forestry Foundation, NGO Rejo Semut Ireng, PSKL, LHK Office of Central Java Province, BPSKL Jabalnusra, Forest Development Financing Center Public Service Agency (P3H-BLU). Each of the above stakeholders has their respective strengths and interests. This affects the pattern of relations between the stakeholders which in turn will determine the results of the program. A good relationship will support the successful implementation of the program while a bad relationship can hamper the implementation of the program.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Articles

##submission.copyrightStatement##

##submission.license.cc.by-nc4.footer##

Copyright and License

All articles published in Wasian Journal are the property of the authors. By submitting an article to Wasian Journal, authors agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright Ownership: The author(s) retain copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions. Authors grant the journal the right to publish the work first and to distribute it as open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  2. Licensing: Articles published in Wasian Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the source of the material

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  3. Author's Rights: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of published work.

  4. Third-Party Content: If your article contains material (e.g., images, tables, or figures) for which you do not hold copyright, you must obtain permission from the copyright holder to use the material in your article. This permission must include the right for you to grant the journal the rights described above.

  5. Reprints and Distribution: Authors have the right to distribute the final published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided that the original publication in Wasian Journal is acknowledged.

For the reader you are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rightsmay limit how you use the material.

Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Jurnal Long Range Planning, 44, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001

Andani, V. P. (2019). Implementasi Ijin Pemanfaatan Hutan Perhutanan Sosial di Desa Wonoharjo, Kecamatan Kemusu, Kabupaten Boyolali . Thesis Tidak Diterbitkan, UGM, Yogyakarta. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/168369

Crosby, B. L. (1991). Technical Notes Stakeholder Analysis: A Vital Tool for Strategic Managers. A publication of USAID’s Implementing Policy Change Project. USAIDS, Washington, DC. https://openlmis.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/04/IPC_Stakeholder_Analysis_A_Vital_Tool_for_Strategic_Managers.pdf

Hastanti, B. W., Irawan, E., Haryanti, N., Raharjo, S. A. S., Hermawan, A., Fandriani, S., & Boediono, A. (2019). Strategi Implementasi Reforma Agraria Sektor Kehutanan. Laporan Hasil Penelitian. Tidak Diterbitkan, BPPTPDAS, Surakarta

Herawati, T., Widjayanto, N., Saharuddin, & Eriyatno. (2010). Analisis respon pemangku kepentingan di daerah terhadap kebijakan hutan tanaman rakyat. Jurnal Analis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 7(1), 13–25. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/29207-ID-analisis-respon-pemangku-kepentingan-di-daerah-terhadap-kebijakan-hutan-tanaman.pdf

Junengsih, J., Putri, E. I. K., & Ismail, A. (2017). Analisis stakeholder dalam pengelolaan DAS Citarum dan limbah industri. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 4(2), 112–124.

Marliyana, T. (2020). Pengorgasian kelompok tani dalam memperjuangkan perhutanan sosial (studi kasus di Desa Mentasan, Kecamatan Kawunganten, Kabupaten Cilacap. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 9(1), 376 295. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jas/article/view/41369/28148

Martin, E., & Winarno, B. (2010). Peran para pihak dalam pemanfaatan lahan gambut: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ilir, Sumatra Selatan. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 7(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2010.7.2.81-95

Murti, H. A. (2018). Perhutanan Sosial bagi akses keadilan masyarakat dan pengurangan kemiskinan. Jurnal Analis Kebijakan, 2(2), 62–75. http://jurnalpusaka.lan.go.id/index.php/jurnalpusaka/article/view/29/27

Muzani. (2014). Strategi peningkatan peran stakeholder dalam pengelolaan mangrove di Kabupaten Tangerang. Jurnal Spatial Wahana Komunikasi dan Informasi Geografi, 12(2), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.21009/spatial.122.04

Nurfatriani, F., & Alviya, I. (2019). Efektivitas kebijakan alokasi lahan 12,7 Juta ha untuk perhutanan Sosial: Studi kasus di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara dan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 16(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2019.16.1

Nurfatriani, F., Darusman, D., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Yustika, A. E. (2015). Analisis pemangku kepentingan dalam transformasik kebijakan fiskal hijau. Jurnal Analisi Kebijakan Kehutanan, 12(2), 105–124.

Oktavia, S., & Saharuddin. (2013). Hubungan peran stakeholders dengan partisipasi masyarakat dalam program agropolitan Desa Karacak Kecamatan Leuwiliang Kabupaten Bogor. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 1(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v1i3.9407

Raharjo, S. A. S., Hastanti, B. W., & Haryanti, N. (2020). Dinamika kelembagaan perhutanan sosial di wilayah Pehutani: Studi kasus di KPH Telawa, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 11(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.11.2.2020.183-197

Roslinda, E., Darusman, D., Suharjito, D., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2012). Analisis pemangku kepentingan dalam pengelolaan Taman Nasional Danau Sentarum Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu, Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, XVIII(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.18.2.78

Yeny, I., Agustarini, R., & Heryati, Y. (2018). Analisis para pihak dalam kerjasama pengembangan hasil hutan bukan kayu di Kabupaten Pasaman Barat. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 15(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2018.15.2.143-164

Zubayr, M., Darusman, D., Nugroho, B., & Nurrohmat, D. R. (2014). Peranan para pihak dalam kebijakan implementasi penggunaan kawasan hutan untuk pertambangan. Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 11(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2014.11.3.239-259