Evaluating the ‘Texting, Sharing and Mentoring’ Method Applied in Community Empowerment Program Based On Trigona Laeviceps Stingless Beekeeping Adoption in Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the texting, sharing, and mentoring (TSM) method as an innovative method of community empowerment applied in 'Go-Honey' program. This method is mixed offline and online with the use of Whatsapp groups connecting program participants, resource persons, and local mentors. Using the Bloom's Taxonomy approach, this study compares the knowledge level of the 'Go-Honey' program participants implementing TSM with other sitngless beekeeping program participants who use the single-face-to-face (TTM) method as a control. The total participants involved in this study were 20 people, half of whom were female members of 'Go-honey', while the other half were not. Participants were asked questions related to cognitive, affective and psychomotor aspects by direct interviews. Observations were also done on the results of the work performance. The results show that the 'Go-Honey' participants have a higher level of knowledge about stingless beekeeping compared to the control model in these three aspects of knowledge. The results of the Mann Whitney test shows that the cognitive, affective and psychomotor scores are significantly different at 1 % alpha. This method has the potential to be applied after the pandemic ends with the principle of distance learning as long as there is the internet connection and the presence of local mentors.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Wasian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License
All articles published in Wasian Journal are the property of the authors. By submitting an article to Wasian Journal, authors agree to the following terms:
-
Copyright Ownership: The author(s) retain copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions. Authors grant the journal the right to publish the work first and to distribute it as open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
-
Licensing: Articles published in Wasian Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the source of the material
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -
Author's Rights: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of published work.
-
Third-Party Content: If your article contains material (e.g., images, tables, or figures) for which you do not hold copyright, you must obtain permission from the copyright holder to use the material in your article. This permission must include the right for you to grant the journal the rights described above.
-
Reprints and Distribution: Authors have the right to distribute the final published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided that the original publication in Wasian Journal is acknowledged.
For the reader you are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rightsmay limit how you use the material.
Abd Jalil, M. A., Kasmuri, A. R., & Hadi, H. (2017). Stingless bee honey, the natural wound healer: A review. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 30(2), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1159/000458416
Ahmad, A., Kamin, Y., & Md Nasir, A. N. (2018). Applying psychomotor domain for competency based teaching in vocational education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1049(1); 1 – 6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1049/1/012049
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., and Wittrock, M. C. (2001). Taxonomy for Assessing a Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. New Jersey: United States of America.
Aslam, M., & Aldosari, M. S. (2020). Analyzing alloy melting points data using a new Mann-Whitney test under indeterminacy. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 32(6), 2831–2834.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.07.005
Cheng, S. H., Macleod, K., Ahlroth, S., Onder, S., Perge, E., Shyamsundar, P., Rana, P., Garside, R., Kristjanson, P., Mckinnon, M. C., and Miller, D. C. (2019). A systematic map of evidence on the contribution of forests to poverty alleviation. Environmental Evidence, Vol. 8(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-019-0148-4
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1558689808330883
Fauzi, H., Aryadi, M., & Titien, M. (2015). Model Kolaboratif Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Berbasis Pembelajaran dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan (Studi pada Lahan Hutan Rawa di Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Konservasi Kuala Lupak). Laporan tidak di terbitkan, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin.
Follo, G., Lidestav, G., Ludvig, A., Vilkriste, L., Hujala, T., Karppinen, H., Didolot, F., and Mizaraite, D. (2017). Gender in European forest ownership and management: reflections on women as “New forest owners.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 32(2), 174–184.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2016.1195866
Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969
Hajaroh, M. (2006). Pengembangan Evaluasi Afektif Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Kependidikan, Nomor 2, 145 – 160.
Hardianti, A. L., Permadi, D. B., & Rohman. (2020). Configuration of resource access explaining the performance of community forest farmer groups in Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 449(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012048
Harsoyo, Oktalina, S. N., Permadi, D. B., Hardiyanto, E. bhakti, Wiyono, & Race, D. (2020). Research report for project on “Enhancing Community-Based Commercial Forestry Empowering Women in Community- Based Commercial Forestry through Master Tree Grower (MTG) Training. Bogor: P3SEKPI.
Kasilingam, G., Ramalingam, M., & Chinnavan, E. (2014). Assessment of learning domains to improve student’s learning in higher education. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 6(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2014.1.5
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Levis, L. rafael. (2013). Metode Penelitian Perilaku Petani. Maumere, NTT: Seminari Tinggi Ledalero.
Maryudi, A., Nawir, A. A., Sekartaji, D. A., Sumardamto, P., Purwanto, R. H., Sadono, R., Suryanto, P., Soraya, E., Soeprijadi, D., Affianto, A., Rohman, R., and Riyanto, S. (2017). Smallholder Farmers’ Knowledge of Regulations Governing the Sale of Timber and Supply Chains in Gunungkidul District, Indonesia. Small-Scale Forestry, 16(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9346-x
Musyafa, & Triyogo, A. (2020). Training on stingless bee cultivation techniques as business opportunity in the pandemic time of covid 19 in Banaran Village Playen Gunung Kidul. dalam Z. Rohmah, L. Hidayati, R. M. Septiana, S. Handayani, R. B. Auwibi, & A. M. Ningrum (Eds.), The 2nd International Conference on Community Engagement and Education for Sustainable Development (ICCEESD), (p.71–76). Yogyakarta: Directorate of Community Services Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Nadeak, B. (2020). The effectiveness of distance learning using social media during the pandemic period of covid-19: A case in universitas kristen indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 1764–1772.
Owen, H. (2011). The Complete Guide to Mentoring: How to Design, Implement, and Evaluate Effective Mentoring Programme. Kogan Page.
Permadi, D. B., Sofiyulloh, M., Triyogo, A., Umami, N., Septiana, M. R., Lutviah, H., & Yuliani, T. S. (2020). Texting to Go Honey the Role of Whatsapp Group Chat to Increase Womens Capacity to Implementing Stingless Beekeeping Program. dalam Z. Rohmah, L. Hidayati, R. M. Septiana, S. Handayani, R. B. Auwibi, & A. M. Ningrum (Eds.), The 2nd International Conference on Community Engagement and Education for Sustainable Development (ICCEESD), (p.353–359). Yogyakarta: Directorate of Community Services Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Permadi, D. B., Umami, N., Triyogo, A., Pujiarti, R., Larasati, B., & Septiana, R. M. (2021). Socio-technical Aspects of Smallholder Beekeeping Adoption of Apis cerana in Wanagama Teaching Forest, Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta. Buletin Peternakan, 45(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v45i1.58435
Ponce, O. A., and Pagán-Maldonado, N. (2015). Mixed methods research in education: capturing the complexity of the profession. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.18562/ijee.2015.0005
Ponto, H. (2020). The evaluation of affective domain learning outcome in students’ basic learning of electrical circuit in vocational education school. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 17(2), 1222–1226. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2020.8793
Prahmana, R. C. I., Hartanto, D., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Ali, R. M., & Muchlas. (2021). Community radio-based blended learning model: A promising learning model in remote area during pandemic era. Heliyon, 7(7), e07511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07511
Santosa, I. (2014). Strategic Management of Rural Community Empowerment: Based Local Resources. International Conference on Public Management (ICPM 2014): International Integration for Regional Public Management: New Challenges and Opportunities, Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 2, 194–199. https://doi.org/10.2991/icpm-14.2014.34
Susilawati, S., & Supriyatno, T. (2020). Online learning through whatsApp group in improving learning motivation in the era and post pandemic COVID -19. Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(6), 852–859.
Stephens, M., and Ormandy, P. (2019). An evidence-based approach to measuring affective domain development. Journal of Professional Nursing, 35(3), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.12.004
Yanchinda, J., Yodmongkol, P., & Chakpitak, N. (2015). Measurement of learning process by semantic
annotation technique on bloom’s taxonomy
vocabulary. International Education Studies, 9(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n1p107
