Analysis Of Tenurial Conflict In Production Forest Management Unit (Pfmu) Model Poiga

الشريط الجانبي للمقالة

Download this PDF file (الإنجليزية)
منشور: Dec 30, 2016
View citations in Google Scholar

محتوى المقالة الرئيسي

Arif Irawan Arif
Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Manado
Kristian Mairi Kristian
Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Manado
Sulistya Ekawati Sulistya
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perubahan Iklim dan Kebijakan

الملخص

This Research aims to determine (1) History, actors and the causes of conflict in terms of the social aspect of economic, cultural and institutional happened in PFMU Model Poigar (2)
Recommendations settlement to parse tenurial conflicts PFMU Model Poigar. Data analysis method used is a qualitative approach. The results showed that land claims by communities began of forest utilization activities to meet basic needs. Tenurial conflicts PFMU Model Poigar is a structural conflict. Some of the main actors should receive priority attention is the processing community land in the area and local employers. Some of the basic causes of conflict tenurial PFMU Model Poigar is a lack of understanding about the existence of related parties PFMU Model Poigar, the dualism of authority, lack of community empowerment, and law enforcement is still weak.Based on consideration of the history, the actors involved and the cause of the conflict, then some of the recommendation of this study is the institutional strengthening KPHP Poigar model, the development of that partnership, and law enforcement.

تفاصيل المقالة

Arif , A. I., Kristian, K. M., & Sulistya, S. E. (2016). Analysis Of Tenurial Conflict In Production Forest Management Unit (Pfmu) Model Poiga. Jurnal Wasian, 3(2), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.62142/1dzm8446
Articles

الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2016 Jurnal Wasian

Creative Commons License

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright and License

All articles published in Wasian Journal are the property of the authors. By submitting an article to Wasian Journal, authors agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright Ownership: The author(s) retain copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions. Authors grant the journal the right to publish the work first and to distribute it as open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  2. Licensing: Articles published in Wasian Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the source of the material

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  3. Author's Rights: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of published work.

  4. Third-Party Content: If your article contains material (e.g., images, tables, or figures) for which you do not hold copyright, you must obtain permission from the copyright holder to use the material in your article. This permission must include the right for you to grant the journal the rights described above.

  5. Reprints and Distribution: Authors have the right to distribute the final published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided that the original publication in Wasian Journal is acknowledged.

For the reader you are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rightsmay limit how you use the material.

Ahmad, A., Saleh, M. B., dan Rusilono, T. 2016. Model spasial deforestasi di KPHP Poigar, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Penelitian Kehutanan Wallacea, 5(2), 159-169.

Dishut Sulut. 2014. Rencana Bisnis (Business Plan) Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (KPHP) Model Poigar. Manado.

____________.2007. Rancangan Pembangunan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH) Model Poigar di Wilayah Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow dan Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Manado.

Hakim, I. & Wibowo, L. R. 2013. Jalan Terjal Reforma Agraria di Sektor Kehutanan. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perubahan Iklim dan Kebijakan.

Handoko, C., dan Yumantoko. 2015. Perspektif lokal terhadap hak dan konflik tenurial di KPHL Rinjani Barat, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Kehutanan Wallacea, 4(2), 157-170.

Harun, M. K., dan Dwiprabowo, H. 2014. Model resolusi konflik lahan di Kesatuan Pemangkuan Hutan Produksi Model Banjar. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 11(4), 265-280.

Herrera, A., dan Passano, M. G,. 2006. Land Tenure Alternative Conflict Management. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

Ilham, Q. P., Purnomo, H., dan Nugroho, T. 2016. Analisis pemangku kepentingan dan jaringan sosial menuju pengelolaan multipihak di Kabupaten Solok, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 21 (2), 114-119.

Kurniadi, E., Hardjanto , Nugroho, B., Sumardjo. 2013. Kelembagaan kemitraan pengelolaan hutan rakyat Di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman, 10 (3), 161–171.

Laila, N., Murtilaksono, K., dan Nugroho, B. 2014. Kelembagaan kemitraan hulu hilir untuk pasokan Air DAS Cidanau, Provinsi Banten. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 11(2), 137-152.

Larson, A.M. 2013. Hak Tenurial dan Akses Ke Hutan: Manual pelatihan untuk penelitian. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

Mayers, J., Morrison, E., Rolington, L., Studd K., dan Turrall, S.. 2013. Improving governance of forest tenure: a practical guide. Governance of Tenure Technical Guide No.2, London dan Roma: International Institute for Environment and Development, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Mukarom, M., Yuwono, T., G, Sirajuddin, Suryodinoto, Maududi, A., Anshar, C., Tuarita, A., Perdana, A. A., Jatiningsih, I., Hrman, Sakinah, A., Jusmowarni, Yumantoko, Maidianto. 2015. Memberdayakan Masyarakat Melalui Kemitraan Kehutanan Kompilasi Tulisan Pengalaman dari KPH Rinjani Barat. Kenitraan Pertnership.

Prastawa, H., Fanani Z., dan Suliantoro, H. 2010. Pengembangan hutan pinus masyarakat berbasis kemitraan sebagai model pemberdayaan masyarakat sekitar hutan. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 11 (2), 178–183.

Pruitt, D. G. dan Rubin, J. Z. 2009. Teori Konflik Sosial. Pustaka Pelajar.Yogjakarta

Rosi, A. G. 2014. Implementasi Pembangunan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH) Pada Unit KPH Produksi Model Poigar. Tesis. UGM.

Sitorus, M. T. Felix. 1998. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Suatu Perkenalan. Bogor. Dokumen Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial.

Sundawati, L., Purnaningsih, N., Purwakusumah, E. D. 2012. Pengembangan model kemitraan dan pemasaran terpadu biofarmaka dalam rangka pemberdayaan masyarakat sekitar hutan di Kabupaten Sukabumi, Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 17 (3), 153-158.

Sylviani, Dwiprabowo, H., dan Suryandari, E. Y. 2014. Kajian Kebijakan Penguasaan Lahan dalam Kawasan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH) di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 11(1), 54-70.

Sylviani dan Hakim, I. 2014. Analisis tenurial dalam pengembangan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH) : Studi kasus KPH Gedong Wani, Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 11 (4), 309-322.

Wakka, K. A., Awang, S. A., Purwanto, R. H., dan Poedjiraharjoe, E. 2012. Analisis kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat sekitar Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan, 19(1), 1-11.

Zain, M. R. N., Soeaidy, S., dan Mindarti, L. I. 2011. Kemitraan antara KPH Perhutani dan LMDH dalam menjaga kelestarian hutan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 210-216.